I think we are approaching either the demise of mankind, or a new spiritual awakening. It is quite simple; the ability to destroy ourselves has never been greater in the history of mankind. We are able to destroy ourselves numorous times with the weapons we have got. The naivety of the west has put the world in an extremely dangerous situation. Atomic weaponry should never have been allowed to states that are very willing to use them. But yet they are, and this puts the world on path to destruction. The west created the weapons of mass destruction, but someone else might use them for real.

We cannot continue finding the destroyers, there will be a time where a roguestate will fire off an atomic bomb. It could very well happen here in Copenhagen with all the fuss an all the conflicts between the east and the west centered in Denmark.

Man was given a responsability to nature. We say that man was made in the image of God. Why? Because man is the only living entity on earth who is given the gift and the curse of intelligence. With intelligence man can rise above nature, and carry out decisions based on thought. Since, according to the classical egyptians, God is nothing but thought, man is an intermediary between God and nature. We are the daimons, the mix of God and nature. We are the guardians of nature. The sheperds of the flowers and the forest, the dolphins and the ants. Because if we do not take the responsability of the intelligence we are given, we will destroy nature, and ourselves. This was the core of the climate meeting, we have to embrace the responsibilty we carry as daimons. But it is not about the Co2 really, it is about not killing each other.

We have, potentially, the gift of God. The gift that could make a universal society based on truth and responsability to things around us. If we abstain from killing and raping each other, we could, with the development within the realms of natural science create a world of abundance and joy. Nature could serve us, in a good way, but on its own conditions. We should carry the task of natural preservation and care, with all the burden of the will of the intelligence of God.

Now how do we reach this target? First of all, someone has to do something about the danish media. Denmark is the hub of the new spiritual enlightentment of the world. But the danish media is doing all it can to stop it. It even goes to the extent as to try to kill whoever opposes its hegemony, as it has tried with me twice. It is really the greatest problem of the world right now, and anyone who have the slightest responsability to the future of mankind should work out a solution to this problem. The whole world should really focus on the wrath of the danish media, fight it, enlighten it, whenever it tries to kill someone, blow the act out into all corners off the world media. Everbody should know about the hatred and the evil materialistic spirit of the danish media. It was shown amply in the last conflict I and Lars Hedegaard just had with the danish media, most of it tried to kill our message. This will not do if we are to reach a solution to the threat of mankind. Forget about Afghanistan, forget about climate change, forget about the conflict between Iran and Israel. The problem is here in Denmark, the danish media is trying to kill the solution to the problem of mankind, with all its might. Christians, muslims, jews, buddhist, agnostics, communists, anarchists, hindus, zoroastrians, bahai, all that cares for the world and the future of mankind, focus on the danish media, put pressure on it, buy it up, force it to stop trying to kill the philosophers of Denmark. It is a system of extreme corruption, of idiocy and no knowledge. It will do almost anything to try to stop any spiritual awakening, any attempt to stop mankind on its path to destruction.  It is the future of all living things that is at stake, and the first barricade to scale is the danish media.

And remember, we do this to carry the torch of light and truth, that torch that is corrupted and put out by the evil materialistic nature of the danish media.

I am very happy to have caused all the commotion in connection to the interview I did with Mr. Lars Hedegaard, the chairman of The Free Speech Society. Once again the media have underestimated me. Perhaps there will be a time when they show a little more intelligence in the fight with me. So far the strategy has been to try to kill me, and then ignore me. But they will have to kill me for real if they are to get rid of me. Otherwise they just have to do what I say. And that is to respect their basic obligation; to search for the light and the truth. In fact be themselves, do what they are supposed to do, follow the example of Voltaire, Socrates, Kirkegaard. Or be the slaves of stupidity.

Well let me explain why I did the interview. First of all it was to shed some light on the dark sides of Islam. We all have faults, and Islam has a lot. The fault of the west is too much liberty, and the fault of the east is too much restrain. Liberty from oppression is something we are encountering in the west because the east has all its rules. This is off cause not tolerable, freedom of expression, freedom of will we should not loose. But when it comes to personal ethics, being a true person with respect for the persons around us, we have a problem in the west. The loyalty to the states are falling apart, the time when a word of man was unbreakable, is long gone. The corruption of the state is picking up its pace. This is the fault of the west. On the other hand, the fault of the east is the conservative strings attached to everything of real importance, and especially  the strings attached to knowledge. Knowledge should not be a item of the state, God or the local priesthood. Knowledge is for everyone, and should be free to attain. Then there is the issue with the girls. Girls are not allowed much in the east, this should stop. Let the girls free, they are beautiful amazing creatures with their faults, but you cannot love a slave. You can only love a free person. If you keep girls as slaves you will not experience the truth of God, because God is not something you can meet in meditation, God you meet with other persons, in love.

Luckily the ignorance of the media is flaunted into the open. It is a bit funny to see all the selfrighteous mediapersons bask around in the limelight, with absolutely no clue about what they are talking about. It is ridicolous. But they should have listened to what I said; you are the guys saying that the emperor has clothes on, and I was right.

Anyway, before we start throwing stones and mud on each other, please everybody, focus on the issue instead of the messenger. It is about the girls, they are raped by evil men. If there is any justice in Islam, it would obviously recognise that rape within families are unjust. And the muslims in the world should be aware of the atrocities done to the danish girls by muslim men. There was a poor girl who were held in shed for a year, beaten, tortured by her muslim boyfriend. How can this but bring a bad name to Islam? Is this the way Islam wants to be represented in the West? If not, it should stop. It is a disgrace to Islam what is happening here in Denmark, and even worse in Sweden.

My father was a muslim from Bangladesh actually. The spirituality I witnessed there was beautiful, but I cannot recognice this beauty in the rape of my friends.

It is an ethical discussion, and right now Islam is low on points here in Denmark.

I will repeat my endeavours, I will fight this fight until I am no more. Because justice and light is not to be abandoned in the cowardice of the western media, and the evil of the western Islam. There will be light as long as I am here, with my companions to serve the truth.

It is not a blame game, it is at quest for beauty and truth. Because only through these principles can we really reach love.

One of the beauties of the internet is the fact, that it gives the philosopher an easy and almost free way to distribute his ideas. Under the french revolution the philosophers had to rely on books and newspapers, much more cumbersome and difficult than the internet.

In the current phase of state-corruption, the philosopher is supposed to be the guardian of society. By giving an understanding of the situation, and provide simple remedies, he or she should try to guide democracy away from the collapse and the subsequent chaos.

The information is there, all you have to do, as a philosopher, is to read “The State” by Plato and “Politics” by Aristotle.

It is actually, seen from an academic point of view, quite easy. The hard task is to distribute the ideas and inspire the politicians to change course from corruption to ethics.

The problem, in its first phase, is therefor solved, the second phase; massdistribution, is however still not an opportunity. People need to understand the problems and why the politicians act as they do. If the people do not know the arguments behind the actions of the politicians, they may be a little confused.

This is where the traditional massmedia is more of a problem to the soceity than a positive force. First the media tried to kill me, then they have ostrazised me, what will the next be? It is absurd, in this very critical phase of democracy, the media tries to kill the guardian of society. How is a state supposed to work, if the media tries to kills its philosophers?

The state needs to do something, the media has morphed into something very dangerous, a threat to society, because of its vile actions and lack of integrity.

Darwin is an interesting person, so influential and yet simple in his way of thinking. As I see it, the return of biological science based on an Aristotelean empirical method is still in its infancy. With all respect to the extensive work done on the major universities in the West. He is a figure of vast discussion in the realm of metaphysics, because he was seen as an imposer to the throne of God. There are extensive fights fought especially in the US over the legacy of Darwin.

I try to heal the wound between physics and metaphysics, and let me underline my basic faithfullness to darwinism, his ideas were right, but he had only grasped some of the principles of nature, not all. So the problem with darwinism is actually not the questionmark put to metaphysics, but the lack of understanding of nature. According to the darwinist Geoffrey Miller, there are actually two principles in work in nature; survival of the fittest and sexual attraction. This is absolutely right, and if you compare his ideas to Empedochles, one the greatest natural scientist of antiquity, they both agree. Empedochles calls it love and strife, Darwin calls it survival of the fittest and sexual selection.

But there is a great difference between Empedochles and Darwin and that is the fact, that Empedochles has a much broader scope of natural principles to present than Darwin; the principles of attraction between living things, the search for justice and so on. To this you have to add the fact that Empedochles was a very religious man, he understood spirituality as a part of nature.

Read more…

The West is broken into two; atomic science and metaphysics.  The schisma goes deep, very deep. It goes all the way down to the very roots of western civilization. Two main roots is what we have; Mesopotamia and Egypt. In Mesopotamia natural science was born; biology, physics, astronomy, banking, writing and living in a city. The first city of Mesopotamia was called Eridu, or Eden in a biblical memory. It is still there, a lonely Ziggurat rising from earth, as a distant memory of past glories.

Egypt was the home of spirituality. One of the best sources to this amazingly beautiful culture is the Hermetica, a poem describing the truth of heaven and earth. It carries such beauty and elegance, that the modern world of corruption and Hip Hop reminds me of a tainted lake, difficult to bathe in, but nevertheless the bath I have to take everyday.

Today these traditions are, at one hand perfectioned in natural science; we fly to the moon, we make computers, we industrialize everything, everywhere. This credo is the cradle of civilization whereever the Anglo Saxons have put heir mark on the world; China, Japan, Australia, the US, South Korea, and so on. Industrialization have become a way of living, an empty sheath of mechanized marching. The paradox of it all in the former communist countries is the fact that communism is a copy of an egyptian tradition. Plato, who must have inspired Marx, copied his things from the Pythagoreans, a secret society with roots in Egypt. So the form of organization is originally created to preserve spirituality, but is today exactly the opposite, a spiritual mechanism aimed at materialism. I think this is one of the vices, and the ultimate downfall of the communists, you cannot worship money, it will give nothing but false living. This is one of the challenges of China, the quest for materialism is the quest for nothing. The virtues of family, trust, and spirituality is paramount.

Read more…

To understand the problems of the West, we have to dig deep, and see through the magnifying glasses of the scientists. Most people do not understand why things are falling apart, the ethics of the society is in decay, some grasp for answers in places of no real interest. But let us have a look on the basis of our society, and see if we can come up with some answers and some questions.

Our perception of the world here in the West is based upon Mesopotamic ideas. These ideas were conveyed into Hellas via philosophers as Animaxander, and again conveyed into modern life through the work of Lucretius, the Roman poet who based his view on nature on the famous Athenian philosopher Epicure.

Epicure saw the universe as a huge Lego playground. Everywhere there are atoms that combine into complex structures. This theory is today the basis of atomic physics; Niels Bohr, Einstein and so on. Seen from a moral and a spiritual point of view, this system leaves the world as a very boring place. In his own time Epicure was also held in a bit of disregard because his ideas made a world of boredom. In his famous “gardens” epicurans roamed, with only the purpose to satisfy their own needs. Not sexual needs, as we concluded with Freud, but the need of friendship and study. In the view of Epicuranism there is no life after death, only the dissolvation of the atoms each person is build of.

Read more…

The local election is over, some cry, some cheer. But all in all, it was a good thing for democracy to see how people and the powermongers take it serious and are uncorrupt in their handling of the system. The first winner is the democratic system itself, no fraud appeared. It was all conducted by local people who respected the groundrules of democracy. It is very cool, and beautiful.

As a see my role as a philosopher, I try to enlighten society, but through my knowledge of the basis of society I also try to inspire. Now, all political parties are heirs to philosophy in some way, both the danish, the foreign, the religious and the nonreligious. So we are all, in a way, the sons and daughters of  Plato. Therefor it is not my task to critizise the parties that are loyal to the heritage of western civilization, now including some who are of an eastern civilization. But only my task to critizise when parties are not loyal to truth, justice and love. When corruption of the fabric of the world occurs. So this is my humble contribution to the different parties of Denmark, a little inspiration. I start form left and go right.

Enhedslisten

Communists are not so popular these days. Perhaps because communism is flawed as a thought construct. It does not work, whereever international socialism is implemented, it fails. This does not imply that it does not have qualities, it has, social justice, enlightentment are good qualities of the socialist system. There have been traitors of Denmark among the communists, and this the communist have to face to get on. Also, the alliance with radical islam is also tearing the communists apart. There are parallel qualities between the original sharia state and communism, but the fact that radical islam is so inspired by Hitler and fascism, should make it the enemy of the communist, not the ally. There are very interesting signs of development in Iran, the people of Iran wants to be free, have democracy. If the communists could combine their moral nature with the values of democracy, it could move on and find find a new path. This was the original idea of Plato, so why not, the leap is not so long.

Read more…

Racisms is a word and a concept that is often used in the current discussions within society, but what is it really? And what is the history behind the concept?

Let us try to trace it back to its origin and discuss the concept of today. The focus on race started with Darwin. In his very famous book Origin of the species, he discussed the development of nature. The thoughts of Darwin have been reflected through the times, in according to the ethics of the time. Darwin published his work in the time of Victoria, so sex and the more profane nature of things was overlooked. It is a petty, because his main work was actually not on the selection by habitat, but selection by sexuality, or if you will love.

The unbalanced focus on the negative trends of nature; selection by strength or strife, led to an emphasis on the waraspect of nature. This was put into a social theoretical frame, that ultimately led to the racial theories of the Third Reich. The theory was, that not only animal races compete over ressources, but also human races do the same. As  a consequence of this idea, Hitler proclaimed that the aryan race was in war with the jewish race. The arabs really liked this idea, although they are very closely related to the jews. Both jews and arabs are semites. Read more…

When Mozart lived he had an opponent called Salieri. Mozart was the wonderkid, the genius who, with very little effort, produced the most spectacular and amazing pieces of classical music. Salieri was the mediocre composer who worked dilligently and hard, but all to no avail, the compositions he produced was just … boring. His intense jealousy towards Mozart is an example on the mediocres feelings towards the geniuses.

One of the problems with danish society today, is the fact that the Salieris have conquered the entire academic system, and through their dilligent and profound control, they ruin all beauty and development of society. Their insistence on the qualities of the multicultural society, their use of such fallacy as racism, islamophobia and other stupid ideas, puts up a veil in front of the basic ideas of a civilized state. Where is the insistence on truth and justice? Where is the stubborn defence of democracy and rule of law? The Salieris forgot it, and they are unable refind the focus on the basis of society.

Read more…

There is an ongoing war between the traditional media and the new media; the blogs. I initiated my career as a debater in the blogossphere, and most of my contacts are part of the blogossphere. This war is extremely decisive for the development of the society, so a discussion on the pro and cons of the new media is vital for the modern democracy.

Let us try to analyze, and see if we can find any qualities of the two, and perhaps some of the new interactive trends.

First of all; there is a tremendous gap of quality between the old and the new media. The discussion on blogs as Gates of Vienna, Uriasposten, and the content of Snaphanen, and Zonkas blog are way better that any of the old media. There are exceptions, the show Deadline in national television is quite good, and some of the content in the newspaper Jyllandsposten is also quite good.

So the blogs have given the avantgarde intellectuals a space to develop new ideas and distribute the ideas in a fast and free way. This is very good for the democracy, the more debate, the more reflection on a serious level, the better for the society. The backside of the new media is however a low level of massdistribution. There are many readers on the major blogs, but it is only people who are very interested in politics that read the blogs. People who are interested in clothing, shoes, parashuting, they watch television.

You may add, that there is a third media that is much more powerful than the new and the old media; rumors. The spread of knowledge through discussion in home and between friends. This type of communication is actually what really matters. The blogs in combination with rumorspreading, is actually the main communication on important issues today. An example;  together with Anders Gravers of Stop Islamization of Denmark i devised an intellectual defense of Denmark, I put democracy and the rule of law in opposition to sharia. This paradigm is today a given fact whereever you go and discuss with people. I have talked with Steen from the blog Snaphanen.dk, and he has the same experience. You put something on your blog, and after a very short time the whole world reflects on it. It is extremely powerful.

Read more…